LaSalle County Nursing Home Cited For Failing To Protect Residents From Sex Abuse

After a full investigation into the sexual abuse of ten residents at LaSalle County Nursing Home, the Illinois Department of Health has determined the facility failed to take preventative measures to protect its residents.  The acts were initiated by a male resident who targeted non-verbal, dementia patients.

IDPH investigators determined the perpetrator started abusing residents on Christmas Eve, but the facility failed to implement measures to stop further abuse from occurring.  A 61-page IDPH survey concerning the incidents at LaSalle County Nursing Home concluded, "Due to the administrative staff's failure to implement policies and procedures for abuse, failure to recognize abuse, and failure to effectively manage facility resources, sexual abuse occurred for 10 residents."

On June 4, IDPH issued an 'Immediate Jeopardy' designation on the facility.  Read more about the sex abuse of residents at the Illinois nursing home here.

Sex Abuse In Nursing Homes

Nursing homes have a duty to protect all residents from harm.  This includes unwanted sexual advances from other residents.  In the case of residents with dementia, special attention should be paid to who is interacting with the residents.  Staff must continually monitor the residents to ensure their safety.

Unfortunately, in the case of disabled nursing home residents, it is particularly important to pay attention to physical symptoms that may indicate sexual abuse:

  • Vaginal / anal bleeding
  • Sexually transmitted disease
  • Bruising
  • Sudden emotional with-drawl
  • Sudden loss of appetite
  • Torn clothing

Lastly, many cases of sex abuse in nursing homes are perpetrated by convicted sex offenders. Though few laws address this topic, a quick check of a sex offender database could identify many of these deviants.  Let your lawmakers know that this is an important topic that deserves their attention.

Related Entries

In Wake Of Sexual Assault Of Elderly Woman, Chicago Nursing Home & Administrator Named In Civil Lawsuit

Failure To Conduct Adequate Pre-Employment Criminal Background Search Costs Assisted Living Facility $750,000

Young, Mentally Ill Residents Pose Significant Threat To Nursing Home Residents

 

Is There A Double Standard For Nursing Home Safety?

Does the government turn a blind eye to the large elderly and disabled population living in nursing homes?  Why does the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) specifically not reimburse hospitals for 10 'reasonably preventable' conditions related to improper care when nursing homes continue to provide the same inadequate care without reprocussion?

Steve Gold, at the JF Activist blog raises these issues in his recent post, 'Stop Paying Nursing Homes That Injure Elderly and Disabled People.'  Steve points out that as (CMS) has begun the crackdown on hospital safety, nursing homes continue to receive poor marks in national surveys.  In 1998, 81% of nursing homes were cited for at least one deficiency during CMS inspections.  By 2001, the number of nursing homes cited for deficiencies had risen to 89%.  In the most recent CMS survey, in 2007, the percentage of nursing homes receiving violations has increased to 91%.

Even more outrageous is the increase in 'immediate jeopardy' and 'actual harm' violations--the most serious-- handed to nursing homes by CMS.  The percentages of 'immediate jeopardy' violations has risen from 1.4% in 1998, 2.3% in 2001, to 17% in 2007.  To give people an idea of what these safety violations entail, Gold cites 2007 CMS OSCAR data:

  • 19.1% of nursing facilities had residents with avoidable pressure sores, and the nursing facilities received deficiencies for failing to meet the federal standard.  Up from 17.2% in 2001.
  • 11.8% of nursing facilities imposed physical restraints on residents for purposes of discipline or convenience and not required by the residents' medical symptoms, and they received deficiencies for this category.  Up from 11.0% in 2001.
  • 19.2% of nursing facilities had failed to prevent incontinence in residents and to restore bladder functioning as much as possible to residents, and the nursing facilities received deficiencies. Up from 12.0% in 2001.
  • 7.0% of nursing facilities failed to provide residents with acceptable nutrition to maintain their body weight, and the nursing facilities received deficiencies.  Down from 8.4% in 2001.
  • 37.9% of nursing facilities failed to ensure residents with environments "free of accident hazards" to "prevent unexpected and unintended injury," and the facilities received deficiency citations.  Up from 22.1% in 2001.
  • 6.6% of nursing facilities failed to provide residents with appropriate range of motion services to those people who required such services, and the nursing facilities received deficiencies.  Down from 8.1% in 2001.
  • 16.6% of nursing facilities failed to promote residents' care in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances the residents' dignity and respect for the individual resident, and the nursing facilities received deficiencies for violating the federal standard.  Down from 17.3% in 2001.

Gold rightly feels that there is a double standard being applied to elderly and disabled nursing home residents.  Most of the safety problems would never be tolerated in a hospital setting, yet we continue to allow them to occur nursing homes.  Until our society puts a premium on helping the elderly, nursing home residents will not get the rights and safety they deserve.  It is unfortunate that our culture turns their head from the elderly and their living conditions.  If any of the above safety problems occurred in a nursery school people would be out in the streets in rage.  Until then, let watch the annual safety violations escalate. 

The JF Activist blog is published by The American Association of People with Disabilities (AAPD).  AAPD is the largest national nonprofit cross-disability member organization in the United States, dedicated to ensuring economic self-sufficiency and political empowerment for the more than 50 million Americans with disabilities. AAPD works in coalition with other disability organizations for the full implementation and enforcement of disability nondiscrimination laws, particularly the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

Spotlight On Medicare Funding For Nursing Homes

Fact is most nursing homes and other long-term care facilities rely in small or large part on funding from Medicare.  Most elderly do not have the assets to live in swank nursing homes that have maid service and four star chefs.  Part of the nursing homes responsibility in accepting Medicare and Medicaid funding is that it must meet certain criteria and standards. 

This article highlights how the Santa Rosa Care Center, in Tuscon, Arizona recently lost its Medicare funding due to its failure to protect residents from sexual abuse.  The article further reported that inspectors found residents at the facility to be in 'immediate jeopardy'.  'Immediate jeopardy' is the term nursing home inspectors use to describe conditions that are so severe that they will not leave the facility until the condition is immediately addressed.

Perhaps the most interesting part of the article is the responses from the readers at the Arizona Daily Star.  Most responses to the article regarding the Santa Rosa Care Center ask for the facility to be immediately shut down.  In theory they are absolutely correct.  However, every response fails to address the fact that the poor still deserve proper care in a safe facility.