Illinois Bill Seeks to Give Families Easier Access to Medical Records


 

The process of obtaining medical records in Illinois can be a frustrating experience for surviving loved ones. Nursing homes are often reluctant to divulge “sensitive” documents, and - compounding the problem- family members are required to go to probate court, by law. The probate process tends to be an extremely time-consuming and inconvenient experience for all involved.

A bill currently under consideration by Gov. Pat Quinn could change things dramatically. The bill, which must be signed by Quinn in order to become a law, would only require that families supply a written request for medical records, along with a small fee.

This represents a major step forward for families seeking to find out the truth about their loved ones. As a personal injury lawyer who’s represented numerous nursing home abuse cases, medical malpractice and wrongful death lawsuits, I often see families who get thwarted in their quest for truth by obscure and impersonal laws. Even as a seasoned lawyer, I’m continually shocked by how difficult it is to obtain these most basic documents.

Family members who suspect their loved one died a suspicious death (and even those who don’t) deserve to know how their relative spent his or her final days. If you think your loved one died under suspicious circumstances, or are encountering difficulties obtaining medical records, we would be honored to speak with you. All of our initial consultations are free and completely confidential.

Update: Governor Quinn signs SB 1694 into law 11/23/11. Check out this new piece of Illinois legislation here.
Related Nursing Homes Abuse Blog Entries:

More Staffing & Stiffer Fines. Welcome To The New Way Of Doing Business For Illinois Nursing Homes?

Perhaps in response to the widely publicized problems involving violence at Illinois Nursing Homes, new legislation would force facilities to increase their staffing levels and improve the care provided to their patients or risk larger fines imposed by the state.

According to legislative sponsor, Senator Jacqueline Collins,

" We are here to say quite boldly and courageously that we're willing to take on the nursing home industry. For too long they've had the influence and power in this state and I want to say that we can mount a strong coalition to state together to fight for policy changes that truly address the disparities in care and the lack of care."

Not surprisingly, the proposed legislation is already being opposed by nursing home industry insiders as unnecessary and too aggressive.

Certainly any legislation that is aimed at improving patient care should be applauded.  For too long nursing home patients in Illinois have be unnecessarily victimized by a system where nursing home operators can legally put their desire for profits ahead of patient needs.  Maybe this legislation could help turn the tables?

Read more about this proposed nursing home legislation here.

Related Nursing Homes Abuse Blog Entries:

Drugs, Criminals & Violence. Welcome To The 'Psychiatric Ghetto' Nursing Home

Illinois Nursing Home Task Force Holds Public Meeting Today

Atleast 50 Convicted Sex-Offenders Living Freely In Illinois Nursing Homes

Sexual Assaults In Nursing Homes, Not Exactly A Pleasant Topic-- But Is An Issue That Needs Attention

New Law May Improve Privacy In Nursing Homes

The following is an article I wrote regarding the "Red Flag Rule" for Long Term Living Magazine. While the focus is to prevent fraud, resident privacy will likely be enhanced as well.

Effective May 1, the Federal Trade Commission’s ‘Red Flags Rule’ will take effect. The rule is intended to help reduce situations involving identity theft and protect consumers’ sensitive information that could be fraudulently used. In looking to facilities with access to patients’ financial information, the government hopes these facilities can help identify and respond to situations involving potential identity theft before serious identity theft problems occur.

Particularly in the long-term care setting, the act is intended to reduce medical identity theft—when a person’s name and insurance information is used without consent to obtain or make false claims for goods or services. It is also in the best interest of the facility to identify suspicious activity on accounts in order to minimize the amount of ‘write-off’ losses.

Examples of potential situations that should trigger the ‘red flag rule’ inquiry by a facility:

· Questions from someone other than the patient himself regarding a bill

· Obviously incorrect addresses and telephone numbers

· Suspicious activity relating to a patient account

· Insurance claim information that does not correspond to a resident’s name and account

Who does the Red Flag Rule apply to?

This broad-based act applies to all entities considered to be a ‘creditor’ under FTC guidelines. All nursing homes and long-term care facilities are impacted by the act because they extend credit to residents regarding payment for services.

The act defines creditors as: ‘[A]ny person who regularly extends, renews, or continues credit; any person who regularly arranges from the extension, renewal, or continuation of credit; or any assignee of an original creditor who participates in the decision to extend, renew, or continue credit.”

How can a facility comply with the rule?

The rule requires facilities to have ‘reasonable’ policies and procedures in place to protect patient information. In the long-term care setting, compliance with the rule is much easier than a high volume physician’s practice. In fact, most facilities would likely be in compliance with the rule if they have a few simple steps in place for new admits to their facilities, such as:

* Train staff how to identify medical identity theft red flags
* Institute policies to verify patient identity
* Assign a staff member to investigate episodes involving discrepancies involving patient information
* Keep resident’s vital information off of as many documents as possible
* Alert authorities of suspicious circumstances

The implementation of basic security precautions should eliminate their liability relating to the safeguarding of residents’ privacy. Only in situations where facilities ‘knowingly’ violate their policy would a penalty be dispensed. The act allows penalties of up to $2,500 per violation.

Nursing Home Bill Could End Bonuses For Poorly Performing Facilities

The Des Moines Register reported on a new bill proposed by Senator Tom Coburn (R- Oklahoma) that would end the practice of paying poorly performing nursing homes a bonus.  Under the current system, nursing homes across the country are paid hundreds of millions of dollars in bonuses by taxpayers regardless of their record of health and safety violations at their facilities.

The Register looked at eight programs in seven states where regulatory violations don't disqualify a nursing home from receiving a bonus and determined the eight programs alone cost taxpayers $312 million per year.  "We paid out in excess of $300 million in bonuses to nursing homes that had significant problems in terms of giving the care and meeting Medicare standards," Coburn said. "Why? Why wouldn't we fix that?"

In addition to providing bonuses to nursing homes that fail to meeting government standards, the government also pays bonuses to nursing homes for legally mandated requirements such as installing fire sprinklers or paying employees minimum wages.

The bill was accepted by unanimous consent of the Senate, but the bill remains to be approved.  Read more about this nursing home legislation here.

Related Nursing Homes Abuse Blog Posts

New Bill Would Return Money To Dangerous Nursing Homes After They Correct Problems

New Law Makes Prosecution Of Nursing Home Cases More Difficult

More Support For The Nursing Home Transparency Act

 

New Bill Would Return Money To Dangerous Nursing Homes After They Correct Problems

A new bill in the Illinois General Assembly could dramatically change the way nursing homes operate in Illinois.  Under Senate Bill 321, proposed by Dan Kotowski (D- Park Ridge, IL), fines imposed against nursing homes for providing poor care and injury could be returned to the facility at the discretion of the Illinois Department of Public Health.

Currently, part of the money collected from fines against Illinois nursing homes is used to provide health monitors who are stationed in troubled nursing homes and used to pay staff members who serve on regional teams to review cases of abuse and preventable death in nursing homes throughout Illinois.  Under the new law funding to these programs would be reduced substantially.

Wendy Meltzer, director of the Chicago-based Illinois Citizens for Better Care, claims SB 321 in its current state, "would be really bad public policy.  The bill essentially eliminates the financial disincentive for bad behavior."  Meltzer call the concept of returning fine money to nursing homes that negligently allow poor nursing home care in their facilities, "morally repugnant."

The bill is opposed by AARP and Illinois Association of Long-Term Care Ombudsmen.

Interestingly, Mr. Kotowski the bill's sponsor, received $15,000 in recent campaign contributions from the nursing home industry.  If passed, Illinois would be the first state to refund nursing home fines according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Web Resource:

Opponents of nursing home bill outraged, The State Journal Register, March 7, 2009

Nursing Homes Abuse Blog Posts On Nursing Home Fines

Iowa Nursing Home Cited For Inadequate Care Of Pressure Sores

Arizona Nursing Home Fined For Multiple Safety Violations

McHenry Nursing Home Hit With $360,000 In Fines

Nursing-Home-Gate: Olbermann Rant On New Bush Legislation

I was forwarded this clip by several people following my post on new legislation that restricts the publics right to access nursing home inspections.  This law throws another hurdle at those who are victims of nursing home abuse and neglect.  Well said Keith!

 

New Jersey Orders Use Of Pressure Relieving Mattresses In Nurisng Homes

Ray Mullman at the South Carolina Nursing Home Blog recently wrote about one of the most progressive piece of legislation passed in years-- the mandatory use of pressure relieving mattresses in New Jersey Nursing Homes to help prevent the development of bedsores.

Unlike normal spring-filled mattresses, pressure relieving mattresses steadily inflate and deflate to reduce the amount of pressure and friction put on bony parts of the body prone that are prone skin break-drown and ultimately development of bedsores (also referred to as: pressure sores, pressure ulcers or decubitus ulcers). 

Under the terms of Bill S-1517, nursing home operators must to switch from regular mattresses to pressure-relief mattresses within three years. Nursing home owners would have one year from the bills enactment to begin phasing in the use of pressure relieving mattresses.

“While pressure redistribution mattresses may cost more up front than the standard spring mattresses, we cannot put a price on the continued health and wellness of our state's most vulnerable senior citizens,” said bill co-sponsor Sen. Bob Gordon (D-Bergen). “While these new mattresses alone won't make bed sores an ailment of the past, they will greatly reduce the incidence of bed sores, and make their treatment much easier on the dedicated nursing home staff.”

Bedsores continue to be a devastating problem for many nursing home and hospital residents.  If this law proves effective in New Jersey, it will be interesting to see if other states, or even Medicare, passes similar legislation.

Bed Sores In Nursing Homes

Government Report Confirms Pressure Ulcers Harm All Nursing Home Residents; Regardless Of Race, Sex or Age

Over 500,000 Adults Suffer From Bed Sores In Hospitals

Nursing Home Injury Laws: New Jersey

Pressure Sore Video

Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers has experieced bedsore lawyers who can answer yor questions.  Contact us for a free, confidential consultation.  We can help.

New Law Makes Prosecution Of Nursing Home Cases More Difficult

Unknown to most, in his later days of his term, former-president George Bush signed off on a new law that effectively clamps down on the publics' access to nursing home inspection reports.  The law was signed into effect without congressional debate or public knowledge. 

In the past, nursing home inspections could be accessed by families by families to help determine if a nursing home was responsible for a suspicious injury or death of a loved one.  Ultimately, the inspection reports were helpful in nursing home litigation as the information helped establish liability on the part of the nursing home.  Similarly, if the report did not contain enough information to prove liability of a nursing home, a decision could be made that there was no sense in pursuing the matter.

Under the new law, state nursing home inspectors and Medicare and Medicaid contractors are considered federal employees, a group usually insulated from provided information in a lawsuit. Additionally, state health departments and contractors are not permitted to participate in private lawsuits involving facilities that receive government funding (virtually all nursing homes) without permission from the head of the Department of Health and Human Services.  Now in order for litigants to access the inspection reports, they must now get a court order to access the information.

"This change hurts nursing-home residents and their families by allowing bad practices to be kept in secret by nursing homes and inspectors," according to Eric M. Carlson and attorney with the National Senior Citizens Law Center in Los Angeles.  "Government inspectors have the right to go into nursing homes and investigate, and they learn things that the residents and families otherwise could never find out."

If anything, the end result of this law is that it encourages nursing home litigation.  With limited information regarding the circumstances relating to an unexplained injury there will be little choice other than to file a lawsuit to access that information. 

Web Resource

New Rule Enacted by Bush Administration Impedes Cases Against Nursing Homes, By Cindy Skrzycki The Washington Post, February 24, 2009

California May Require Nursing Homes To Display Their Federal Ratings

A proposal has been sent to Governor Arnold Schwartzenegger for consideration that would force California nursing homes to publicly display their federal CMS ratings.   Under the proposal initiated by Los Angeles County Supervisor Mike Antonovich, nursing homes would be required to prominently display their 'starred rating' so all nursing home visitors and residents can see them.  CMS's nursing home ratings are based on a variety of quality controls including: medical care, staffing levels, food sanitation, bedsore mitigation and results from inspections. 

This is not the first time Antonvich has advocated to make inspection reports public.  Approximately ten years ago, Antonovich lead an initiative to post health inspection grades in restaurants throughout Los Angeles County.  According to Antonovich, posting nursing home rating would have a positive impact quality of the nursing facilities;

"This vital information equips families to make informed decisions about the care of their loved ones.  It provides incentives for facilities to establish high quality standards and compliance."

I hope this concept gets implemented in California and throughout the country.  Requiring nursing homes to display their rating would hopefully instill a sense of pride amongst those who operate and work in the nursing home industry.  Does anyone really want to work in a facility receiving one star? Better yet, does any family really want to place their loved one in a facility deemed to be 'much below average'?  Read more about this California proposal here.

California Toughens Laws To Fight Elder Abuse

Three new laws have recently taken effect in California to help protect seniors from physical abuse, neglect and financial exploitation. 

  • SB 1140- Attempts to define elder abuse more clearly and provides stiffer penalties.  Taking advantage of a person's weakness of mind, lack of confidence or physical frailty - known as 'undue influence'  - is now grounds for criminal action.  The law requires immediate return of the senior's property if taken under undue influence.
  • SB 1136- Provides punitive penalties to those who con senior into paying for free services such as Medi-Cal or Medicare coverage.
  • AB 2100- Require state ombudsmen, those who police nursing homes and assisted living facilities, to report suspected abuse to the District Attorneys Office.

'I think we are only seeing the tip of the iceberg right now," said Mike Gargiulo, head of the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Elder Abuse Division.  "Our business  is going to expand exponentially with the aging population."

According to the U.S. Census, the number of people over 65 is expected to grow from the present figure of 39 million to 62 million by 2025.  Currently, the American Psychological Association estimates that 2.1 million seniors suffer from elder abuse, but only a small percentage of the cases get reported to officials.  Read more about new laws to protect the elderly here.

If you are the victim of abuse or suspect abuse of a loved one, the National Center For Prevention Of Elder Abuse has a useful website that provide information on reporting abuse for each state.

Tennessee Legislature Attempts To Limit The Rights Of Injured Nursing Home Residents

Lawmakers in Tennessee are attempting to limit the rights of those injured due to nursing home abuse & neglect.  Under a bill proposed by State Senators Jim Tracy (R-Shelbyville) and Randy Rinks (D- Savannah), nursing home residents injured or killed due to a facilities poor treatment would be limited to a recovery of $300,000 in non-economic damages.  The bill would also place a cap on punitive damages against nursing homes of $600,000.

This protectionist legislation would provide little incentive for poorly equipped nursing homes to 'clean up their act.'  Taking the decision making process away from a jury of one's peers sets a dangerous precedent in an industry riddled with problems related to patient safety.  Read more about this potentially dangerous development impacting Tennessee Nursing Homes here.

Nursing Home Surveyor Explains Applicability Of Federal & State Nursing Home Regulations

In the past I have posted on nursing home receiving violations from state and federal nursing home inspectors.  What are these regulations?  Who actually issues the violations? How do the regulations impact nursing homes?

This guest post from Jenn at Nursing Home Surveyor blog addresses these questions and provides useful guidance in interpreting the regulations.  Jenn's perspective on regulations is exceptionally useful as she is a state nursing home surveyor.

Hospitals and Nursing Homes, places that are supposed to be of benefit to many people, yet for many others, they are places that have brought problems and even unexpected, needless death. It’s almost a daily occurrence where one can read or hear in the news of a problem in a hospital or nursing home that led to the needless suffering and/or death of someone who put their trust and faith in a facility. It is because of the problems that occur on a daily basis in some places that all of us need to be aware of what to look for. You need to keep you eyes open whenever you or a loved one enters a hospital or nursing home. You should also be aware of where the regulations that govern a hospital or nursing home are located.

There are state regulations, and each state will have a different code, title, or set of regulations. They may vary from one state to another, but very often the state regulations will mirror the federal regulations. The federal regulations can be found in a document the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid publish. This document is the State Operations Manual. It is composed of many chapters and many ‘appendices”. It is the appendices that contain a copy of the text of regulations that govern hospitals and nursing homes, as well as the “guidelines” that help investigators of nursing homes and hospitals conduct an investigation (a survey) of a facility. I go into more detail about this at my blog, if you would like more detail.

Let me talk about the nursing home regulations for a bit. Those are found in what is called Appendix PP (Appendix double P). The set up of the Appendix has a regulation first, and then some guidance, probes, and procedures following it. In order to easily find particular parts of regulations, the nursing home regulations are split into tags, called “F-tags”.

The Federal regulations help bring consistency to care provided to residents of nursing homes. Nursing Homes must comply with the regulations, and the nursing homes are supposed to be surveyed for compliance to the Federal regulations on an average of every 9 to 15 months. Some states do well in meeting that goal, others do not do so well.

If a facility is found to not be in compliance with a regulation, they will receive a “deficiency”. They have to then write a plan of correction, which means they must explain how they are going to correct the problem and ensure it never happens again. After the facility sends in their plan of correction, the state agency reviews it and determines if it is acceptable. If it is not acceptable, the facility must re-write it. For some facilities just seeing the plan of correction in writing is good enough, but for other, a “re-visit” is planned. Much of this is dependent on the severity and scope of the problems in the facility.

If a facility continues to not be in compliance, they can be put into a “decertification track” meaning that they will lose the opportunity to receive Medicare and Medicaid monies to pay for resident care. This is serious, so facilities do try to maintain their certification. They can also lose their state license to operate if the fail to comply with regulations.

Facilities are given ample time to comply. Although the surveyors are not “consultants” to the nursing homes, the nursing homes do have many avenues to pursue to help them become compliant with regulations.

So what should you do if you or a loved one needs to enter a nursing facility? There are many sites, such as Nursing Home Surveyor, that can help you explore the good and bad so you know where the good ones are and avoid the “not so good”. It is important that you take the time to read the history of the facility you are considering, and read the most recent surveys. One of the regulations requires the nursing home to post their most recent surveys in a public place so the public and the residents of the facility have easy access to the results. This is often the main lobby.

Be safe and be informed!

JL

Jenn is a state surveyor and invites you to visit her blog at: www.nursinghomesurveyor.com for more help and information about the survey/investigation process.

New Version Of Nursing Home Transparency Act

A new version of the Nursing Home Transparency Act and Quality Act of Care has been proposed in the House of Representatives by Pete Stark (D- CA) and Jan Schakowsky (D- IL).  The new version of the legislation is a modification of an earlier bill proposed by Senator Herb Kohl (D- WI) and Charles Grassley (R- IA) earlier this year.  The new version contains more stringent requirements for nursing homes and other long-term care facilities.  Specifically, the new bill contains additional provisions for quality assurance and improvement demonstration program.  According to Representative Stark,

"As the government pays for 60% of spending on nursing homes annually, with 80 percent of residents supported by public funds at any time, we have the responsibility to hold the homes accountable for the quality of care they provide."

Not surprisingly, The American Health Care Association (AHCA), which represents many nursing homes and long-term care facilities opposed the bill calling it "highly subjective, inconsistent and an inaccurate assessment of quality.

With more than 90% of nursing homes across the U.S. cited for violations--many of which that directly impact patient safety, the new bill is not only timely, but essential to assure some level of decent quality care for nursing home residents. Read more about the proposed version of the Nursing Home Transparency Act here.

 

The Fairness In Nursing Home Arbitration Act Moves Closer To Becoming Law

The Senate Finance Committee passed the Patient Safety and Abuse Prevention Act, S. 2838 which notably abolishes mandatory arbitration clauses and establishes a nationwide system of background checks to stop convicted felons from working in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities.

The bill is now going before the full Senate.  The legislation puts in place a system of background checks and encourages federal and state coordination. It will utilize the FBI’s national database and state police records in order to effectively screen potential care-givers for criminal history. The criminal background checks will prevent common incidents involving: sex abuse, physical abuse and neglect

Nursing home arbitration clauses have been a sneaky secret inserted into admission documents for unsuspecting nursing home residents and their families.  The arbitration clauses attempt to force cases involving nursing home injury or death to be resolved before an arbitrator as opposed to being able to have their case heard in court.  In many circumstances the arbitrators are actually paid by the nursing homes--hardly impartial.

The Watchdog Blog and specifically blog authors, David Arkush and Christine Hines did a nice job describing how the nursing home industry did its best to misrepresent the importance of a right to jury trial for nursing home cases.  Arkush and Hines sum it up best when describing the intentions of nursing home owners attempts to continue with mandatory arbitration, 'We're corporate lobbyists fighting for the right to neglect or abuse elderly nursing home residents with impunity.  Our corporate clients want to make millions in profits without worrying about being held accountable if they hurt people.'

Call your senator and tell him or her to vote to support the Fairness In Nursing Home Arbitration Act.

 

Patient Safety And Abuse Prevention Act Closer To Becoming Law

Keeping criminals out of the nursing home industry is the intent of the Patient Safety and Abuse Prevention Act (S. 1577). The act became one step closer to becoming law this week when the Senate Finance Committee unanimously passed the aft this week. The Act would establish a nationwide system of background checks for potential nursing home and long-term care employees.

If passed by the Senate, the bill would allow nursing homes to weed out potentially abusive caregivers from the hiring pool. Bill sponsors Sens. Herb Kohl (D-WI) and Pete Domenici (R-NM) in a statement called the bill an important step toward protecting seniors from mistreatment by those who care for them.

Background checks work.  Earlier this year, the Senate Special Committee on Aging, which Kohl chairs, announced that a three-year, seven-state background check pilot program had prevented thousands of potentially abusive candidates from gaining employment in the long-term care field. Read more about Patient Safety and Abuse Prevention Act here.

Illinois has a similar law on the books when the Governor signed HB 2531 into law.

More Support For The Nursing Home Transparency Act

The National Citizens' Coalition for Nursing Home Reform (NCCNHR), a grass roots foundation dedicated to the improvement of long-term care across the county, has put its support behind the Nursing Home Transparency and Improvement Act (S. 2641). The Nursing Home Transparency Act is the first major piece of legislation directed to the quality of care for nursing home resident since creation of the Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987.

As the name implies, the Nursing Home Transparency and Improvement Act provides essential information for nursing home residents and their families when choosing a facility and while monitoring the quality of care received during a stay. The new act would also provide all the relevant information on a convenient website.

The Act would make the following important nursing home changes, according to the NCCNHR:
  • Disclosure of nursing home ownership and management. Corporations would be required to disclose their owners, operators, financers, and other related parties. Facilities that were part of chains would be required to submit annual audits. Purchasers would have to demonstrate that they were financially able to run facilities.
  • Abolish mandatory arbitration clauses from all long-term care facilities.
  • Require disclosure of how Medicare and Medicaid funds are spent.  Providers would have to report wage and benefit expenditures for nursing staff on cost reports. Cost reports would be revised to categorize spending for direct care, such as nursing and therapies; indirect care, such as housekeeping and dietary services; capital costs, including buildings and land; and administrative costs, which often include the company's profits.
  • Establish independent monitoring of chains. The federal government would develop a protocol for an independent monitor of chains to analyze their financial performance, management, expenditures, and nurse staffing levels. It would provide for corrective action and collection of civil monetary penalties.
  • Collect accurate information about nurse staffing. The government would collect data electronically from nursing homes on the number of RNs, LPNs, and nursing assistants, using payroll records and contracts with temporary agencies as the source. Data would include turnover and retention rates and hours of care per resident provided by each category of worker.
  • Provide better public information about nursing homes. Nursing Home Compare would be updated with more timely reporting of surveys; ownership information; accurate nurse staffing data, including turnover and retention rates; links to survey reports (Form 2567) when states put them on-line; enforcement actions; and all Special Focus Facilities identified for three years.
  • Information on nursing homes would be accessible on a centralized website. Implement new consumer complaint processes The government would develop a standardized form consumers could use in filing complaints with the state regulatory agency or ombudsman. States would be required to establish a complaint resolution process for residents' representatives who were retaliated against, including denied access to residents, if they complained about quality of care or other issues.
  • Provide for higher civil monetary penalties.  Since the 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act, there has been no increase in the penalties assessed nursing home for violations.  Then new law would fine nursing homes - up to $100,000 in the case of a resident's death. Fines would be held in escrow during appeals of deficiencies, no longer delayed until appeals were resolved. Federal CMP funds, which are now returned to the U.S. Treasury, are encouraged to be used for the benefit of residents.
  • Provide for reporting of closures and continuation of federal payments. Nursing homes would be required to give 60 days notice of closure, including a relocation plan and assurances that residents would be transferred to the most appropriate facility or other setting. No new residents could be admitted after the notice was given, and the federal government could continue Medicare and Medicaid funding for residents until relocation was completed.
  • Authorize studies of temporary management; special focus facilities; culture change; and nurse aide training. The bill provides for studies of temporary management; the characteristics of Special Focus Facilities, including ownership; best practices in culture change; and training of nurse aides and supervisors. Dementia management would be added to the initial 75-hour nurse aide.
Contact your legislator today and let them know you support the Nursing Home Transparency Act. You can visit the NCCNHR website to find more information about the Nursing Home Transparency Act.  It is a great piece of legislation and gives the elderly far more power than they currently have.

Support Mandatory Nursing Home Insurance

If an Illinois Nursing Home abuses, injures or kills your loved one, you may have no recourse.  Currently, there is no mandatory insurance coverage for Illinois Nursing Homes, assisted living facilities or long-term care facilities.  It is up to the facility to decide if they want insurance and if so how much coverage they desire.

Many victims of nursing home abuse go uncompensated for injuries sustained due to the fault of the staff because of the failure of Illinois to require insurance coverage.  Nursing homes may appear to have large assets and be capable of satisfying any judgment against them.  The truth is that most facilities  have a complicated corporate structure to make a recovery difficult.  Further, many nursing home owners are sham corporations governed by foreign law.

In an effort to change the current state of nursing homes in Illinois, House Representatives John Bradley and Mary Flowers, are the sponsors of House Bill 3445.  HB 3445 amends the current Nursing Home Care Act and would require the following:
  • Require nursing home owners to have minimum insurance of 1 million per occurrence
  • Allows the Illinois Department of Public Health to revoke nursing home license for owners without the necessary coverage
  • Provides a penalty for facilities without coverage as 'Type A' violation under the Nursing Home Care Act
  • Forces disclosure of each nursing home's insurance policy to the public
  • Forces a nursing home licensee to pay 3 times the actual damages, or $500 whichever is greater (rather than the actual damages) and costs and attorney's fees to a resident whose rights have been violated
HB 3445 is an important piece of legislation for all current nursing home residents and for the people of the State of Illinois.  Contact your State Representative and tell them you support HB 3445.

New Star Ranking System For Nursing Homes


Restaurants, hotels and soon nursing homes will be rated according to a 'star system.'  By the end of 2008, the government will implement a new rating system which would allow residents and their families access to a centralized nursing home rating system. 

According to an Associated Press article on the new rating system, the new system will be based on input from observers, federal and state nursing home inspectors and on staffing levels.  The American Health Care Association, urges the government to base the rating solely on data from nursing home inspections as they believe them to be a more accurate indicator of nursing care.

The concept for a new system came from Senator Ron Wdyden, D- Oregon, who noted it was easier to compare washing machines than nursing home under the current system.

Welcome To The Nursing Home. Let's Begin Our Assessment and Care Planning

"How do you know if the nursing home is providing the necessary care to my loved one?"

This question gets asked repeatedly by families who have a relative in a nursing home. One of the first places to begin an investigation into whether the resident is getting the proper level of care in a nursing home is by looking at documents related to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI).

Within 14 days of admission, new nursing home residents must be evaluated by the nursing home staff for the purpose of conducting a RAI under the Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987 (contained in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, OBRA 1987) and specifically codified at 42 CFR 483.20 (b)(1)(i)-(F272).

The RAI has three elements: MDS- minimum data set, RAPS- resident assessment protocols and utilization guidelines. The acronyms are confusing, however each element of the assessment is intended to provide a customized care plan for each nursing home resident. Each area has specified criteria for the nursing home staff to address when making their assesment. It is up to the staff to address other areas that are relevant to individual resident-- regardless of their omission from the RAI. Families of the new residents should actively participate in this process.

The first step in conducting the RAI is the MRS. The MDS (Minimum Date Set) is a set of screening items that forms the foundation of all long-term care residents at Medicare and Medicaid certified facilities. This is a standardized list to allow facilities a consistent ‘measuring stick’ to analyze resident improvement or deterioration while at the facility and to help new facilities or agencies get a quick analysis of the patient.

A completed MDS is an extremely valuable tool in determining whether the needs of a nursing home resident are met. An MDS is a legal document, which must be signed by all health care professionals who assist in completing it. The completed MDS is also significant in that it is used for Medicare and Medicaid billing. Its accuracy for both patient needs and for billing purposes is essential. The MDS items are detailed below:

  •  Identification and background information
  • Cognitive patterns
  • Communication / hearing patterns
  • Vision patterns
  • Mood and behavior patterns
  • Psychological well being
  • Physical functioning and structural problems
  • Continence in the last 14 days
  • Disease diagnoses
  • Health Conditions
  • Oral / nutritional status
  • Oral / dental status
  • Skin Condition
  • Activity pursuit patterns
  • Medications
  • Special treatments and procedures
  • Discharge potential and overall status
  • Signature and attestation
  • State defined section
  • Required for Medicare assessments
  • Medications
  • Resident Assessment Protocol (RAP) study

Continue Reading

The Illinois Nursing Home Act & Resident Rights

Illinois nursing home residents are protected under The Nursing Home Care Act (210 ILCS 45). The Act covers nursing home residents regardless of whether the facility is operated for profit or not. Under the Act, a ‘nursing home’ must fit into the category of a ‘long-term care facility’ in order for the law to apply.

A ‘long-term care facility’ is defined as a ‘private home, institution, building, residence, or any other place, whether operated for profit or not, or a country home for the infirm and chronically ill…which provides through ownership or management, personal care, sheltered care or nursing for 3 or more persons, not related to the applicant by blood or marriage….It also includes homes, institutions, or other places operated under the authority of the Illinois Department of Veterans’ Affairs.’

This law assures nursing home residents are free from abuse or neglect. If a resident is abused or neglected they are entitled to recover damages from the facility and/or their owners. Injured nursing home residents may recover money damages for past and future damages for pain and suffering, loss of normal life and medical expenses. Additionally, the Act allows residents to recovery attorney fees and costs.

Nursing home ‘abuse’ is defined as intentional infliction of a physical or emotional injury on a resident. Nursing home abuse is different from negligence in that it is not accidental. An example of abuse in a nursing home is sexual assault or battery.

Nursing home ‘neglect’ is defined as the failure to provide necessary medical treatment or assistance. Neglect is the result of the action or inaction of the nursing home staff to address residents’ needs. Common examples of nursing home neglect are: significant weight loss, bed sores, unexplained broken bones and severe cognitive decline.

I encourage you to review the Nursing Home Care Act to learn what your rights area. For a good synopsis of nursing home residents rights, below  is a list compiled by Illinois Legal Aid:

  • You have all your rights as a U.S. citizen, including voting, freedom of religion and freedom of speech
  • You have the right to manage your financial affairs. You cannot be denied access to any money the nursing home holds for you.
  • The nursing home must give you information on how to apply for Medicaid along with the rules for “spousal impoverishment”
  • You have the right to private and readily available mail, phone calls and visitation
  • You are entitled to respect and privacy. Staff must knock before entering your room
  • You must be permitted to have and wear your own clothes. Clothes the facility gives you must fit properly
  • You have the right to see and copy all your medical records
  • You may use your own personal doctor (at your expense or under your personal insurance coverage)
  • The home cannot make you perform work for the facility
  • You have the right to be informed of your present medical diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. The facility must keep your medical and personal care confidential
  • You can refuse any medical treatment unless needed to prevent harm to others
  • The nursing home must honor any “do not resuscitate” (Living Will) orders that are on file and must develop a policy for keeping such orders on file
  • You cannot be physically restrained or drugged without a doctor’s order. You may not be abused or neglected at any time. You cannot be strapped down unless a doctor orders it
  • You can present grievances to the administration or anyone else without being penalized or discharged
  • You can call or see your attorney, social worker or local ombudsman privately during business hours
  • You and your spouse living in the same nursing home can live in the same room unless there is a medical reason against it
  • The home must provide convenient access to mailing facilities and telephones. It must allow daily visiting between 10 a.m and 8 p.m.
  • The home must discharge or transfer you at your request (or guardian’s request)

If you notice the nursing home in which you or your loved one is a resident at a nursing home that violates the above rights, I suggest you do one or more of the following:

Continue Reading

Ombudsmen In Nursing Homes

The other day I posted regarding the violations nursing home inspectors commonly miss.  In defense of the likely overworked and underpaid inspectors- -their job its difficult.  They are expected to uncover nursing home safety violations and neglect at many different facilities in a single visit.  I received several messages from subscribers to our blog voicing concern over the inherent inadequacy in the inspection system.

I came across this article which details a potential solution to this problem.  I was mighty impressed with the simplicity of this idea.  For states facing budget problems and in the midst of nursing home inspector shortage this is a great solution.  The program allows nursing home residents to develop a relationship with the ombudsmen and provides the unique opportunity to monitor facilities on a daily or weekly basis.  Well done!

Vote 'Yes' To House Bill 2641

More than 20 years the Nursing Home Reform Act was passed to protect residents of nursing homes.  Has the law helped?  Of course it sets standards for the care and treatment of nursing home residents.  However, as the Act ages, nursing homes and the companies that own and operate them have become increasingly sophisticated in ways to meet the standards, yet still skimp on the level of care required to properly tend to many residents needs.

A new bill in the Senate Finance Committee, the Nursing Home Transparency and Improvement Act (S2641), would overhaul current nursing home standards.  For example, the new bill would require nursing homes to: clearly state ownership information, standardize complaint forms, improve reporting on staffing information, and replace some self-reported information with independent audits. 

The new bill would make selection of a nursing home easier for elderly and their families.  Families  would know who the owner of a facility is and have access to information on its staff.  Under the current system many nursing homes hide ownership information in order to make bringing a complaint or filing a lawsuit as difficult as possible. 

The bill would also give those responsible for enforcement of the law more muscle.  The bills sponsors, Senator Charles Grassley and Senator Herb Kohl intend the fines  and penalties for failure to comply with the laws be strong enough to deter the behavior as opposed to the cost of doing business.

I encourage you to contact your congressman using the this link and ask them to vote 'yes'.

About Jonathan Rosenfeld

Photo of Jonathan Rosenfeld

Jonathan Rosenfeld is a lawyer who represents people injured in nursing homes and long-term care facilities.   Jonathan has represented...

Read More

Subscribe

Add this blog to your feeds or subscribe by email using the form below

Concerned about a loved one? Talk with an attorney today.

Bed Sore FAQs

Frequently asked questions on bed sore prevention, treatment and legal rights of those who have been neglected.

View FAQs