Are too many nursing home patients receiving psychiatric drugs?

dementia patient.jpgIf you ask government inspectors, the answer is a resounding--- YES.  

Today, physciatric drugs-- and anti-psychotic drugs in particular-- are prescribed to an astounding 14% of all nursing home patients.  The bulk of the psychiatric drugs are administered to patients with dementia or Alzheimer's in order to calm their potentially aggressive behaviors.

Despite the prevalence of this practice, anti-psychotic drugs such as AstraZeneca's Seroquel and Eli Lilly's Zyprexa have been associated with an increased mortality rate in seniors.  Other documented side-effects include: elevated blood sugar levels, increased cholesterol and weight gain.

Even with their dangers, doctors can legally prescribe anti-psychotic medications for off label use.  What is not legal, however, is for drug companies to actively promote the off label uses of their drugs when they have not been cleared by the FDA.

This controversial--- but widespread issue-- took front and center when an inspector from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) told a Senate Committee on Aging about how widespread the practice of prescribing psychiatric drugs for off label use has become in the nursing home industry.

As a solution to this prevalent issues, HHS Inspector General Daniel Levinson suggested that Medicare should stop reimbursing nursing homes for expenses related to inappropriate off-drug use.  Further, if nursing homes continue the dangerous practice, Levinson suggested that the offending facilities get removed from the Medicare program altogether.

As a lawyer who has seen how these powerful psychiatric drugs can adversely impact nursing home patients, I urge lawmakers to consider Mr. Levinson's proposal.  In addition, I would hope that the FDA take the regulation of this class of drugs one step further and simply ban the practice of prescribing anti-psychotic medications for dementia patients.

Read more about this topic in the Washington Post article "Gov't inspector says penalties needed to curb use of psychiatric drugs in nursing homes" here.

Related Nursing Homes Abuse Blog Entries:

Government Continues To Pay For Nursing Home Patients To Receive Unnecessary Anti-psychotic Medications

Pile On The Medication

Nursing Home Employees Plead 'Not Guilty' To Charges Related To The Intentional Chemical-Sedation Of 22 Elderly Residents

Half Of Nursing Home Residents Wrongly Drugged

Illinois Lawsuit Claims Actos Caused Man's Bladder Cancer

actosWhen Robert Bettorf started taking Actos in 2007, he thought it might help control his Type II diabetes.

Instead, he got cancer.

Bettorf is one of several people to recently come forward with allegations that Takeda PharmaceuticalsActos drug directly causes bladder cancer. He joins Nancy Rios, 54, of Reading, Pennsylvania, who says she now faces the possibility of losing her bladder. And Tommy Thompson, of New Orleans, Louisiana, who filed suit in federal court on September 9.

Like many around the country, Bettorf says his cancer was caused by long-term exposure to Actos. Recent FDA studies have indicated that those who take Actos for 12 months or longer are at a 40 percent higher risk for developing bladder cancer.

“An increased risk of bladder cancer was observed among patients with the longest exposure to Actos, as well as in those exposed to the highest cumulative does of Actos,” a Sept. 17 study said.

Despite early links to heart failure, Actos became the No. 1. diabetes drug in the United States, posting sales of $2.9 billion in 2006, and more than $4.3 billion in 2010. More than 2.3 million people were prescribed Actos, or similar drugs, in 2010.

As evidence mounts against Takeda, I wouldn’t be surprised if the pharmaceutical giant will face lawsuits numbering in the thousands.

If you or your loved is affected by adverse side effects of Actos, I would encourage you to seek legal action without delay. Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers remains committed to to helping you understand your legal rights, and to moving your case forward as quickly as possible.

Related:

What We Know and Don’t Know Huffington Post October 24, 2011

Lawsuit Accuses Diabetic Drug Manufacturer Takeda of Not Warning of Risks of Bladder Cancer The Louisiana Record September 16, 2011

Diabetes Drug Clouded in Lawsuits CBC - Canada August 5, 2011

FDA Safety Announcement Regarding Actos June 15, 2011

New Lawsuit Claims Actos Caused Bladder Cancer

bloodsugarmonitor.jpgA man with Type 2 diabetes has filed a lawsuit in federal court against the manufacturer of popular diabetes drug Actos following his development of bladder cancer after taking the drug.

The lawsuit alleges that Actos' manufacturer, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America (and other entities including: Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Takeda San Diego Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc and Eli Lilly and Company), was negligent for not providing any warnings regarding the increased bladder cancer risk associated with Actos use.

Connection between Actos and bladder cancer

The lawsuit against Takeda comes on the heels of an announcement and product labelling change ordered by the FDA associating long-term Actos use with a substantial increase in the development of cancer in the bladder. 

Much of the concern is related to a study of Actos users over a 10 year term which firmly established that people taking Actos were 40% more likely to develop bladder cancer than those not taking the drug.  The study published in the journal Diabetes Care further concluded that bladder cancer rates increased as the duration of use and dosage levels increased.

Similar studies conducted by researchers in France confirmed the increased risk of bladder cancer in Actos users compared with other types of diabetes drugs.  In response to the European study, both France and Germany have pulled Actos from the market altogether.

The increased popularity of Actos

After the medical community discovered the association between heart problems and Avandia usage in diabetic patients, many doctors switched their patients to Actos as a safer alternative.  The popularity of Actos quickly increased to the point that it was the most popular drug used to treat people with diabetes.  In 2010 alone, more that 2.3 million people were prescribed Actos or similar medications containing pioglitazone.

The popularity of Actos has been extremely good for its manufacturer, Takeda Pharmaceuticals.  In the past year alone, sales of Actos have produced revenues of $3.4 billion for Takeda!

Takeda's duty to protect its users

Given the prevalence of Actos use, it is likely that we are only in the initial phase of discovering how many people have been irreparably harmed by this drug.   As early lawsuits are initiated, we will likely learn a good deal more about just how much Takeda knew about the increased rates of bladder cancer in people using their drug.

Given the long-term studies that have already demonstrated a clear connection between Actos and bladder cancer, Takeda's failure to warn seems apparent.

Legal options for Actos users who have developed bladder cancer

Bladder cancer is a painful, embarrassing and potentially fatal disease.  Depending on when the disease is diagnosed, patients may face years of invasive treatments such as: chemotherapy, radiation treatment, surgery or immunotherapy.  In lawsuits against Takeda, damages can be recovered for all related medical care, pain and even death.

Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers remain committed to fully protecting the legal rights of those who have suffered following Actos usage.  We have a team of medical experts to effectively screen cases and help move cases forward as quickly as feasible.  Call our office or fill out the contact form and we will provide you with a consultation regarding your rights.

Related Actos Information:

Lawsuit accuses diabetic drug manufacturer Takeda of not warning of risks of bladder cancer The Louisiana Record September 16, 2011

Regulatory Action on Rosiglitazone by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, The New England Journal of Medicine by Janet Woodcock, M.D., Joshua M. Sharfstein, M.D., and Margaret Hamburg, M.D., N Engl J Med 2010; 363:1489-1491October 14, 2010

Risk of Bladder Cancer Among Diabetic Patients Treated With Pioglitazone (pdf) DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 34, APRIL 2011

FDA Drug Safety Communication: Update to ongoing safety review of Actos (pioglitazone) and increased risk of bladder cancer

Study Questions If Use Of Narcotic Painkillers Are Causing Unnecessary Harm To Elderly

If you ever needed proof that there's no such thing as a 'safe' drug, check out a new study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine conducted by Daniel Solomon.  

The results of the study were discussed in a New York Times article, "Narcotic Painkillers May Pose Danger to Elderly Patient, Study Says," and the overwhelming conclusion was that narcotic painkillers put seniors at an increased risk for: bone fractures, heart attack and death compared to milder, over-the-counter pain relief medications such as Advil and Motrin.

In reaching its conclusions, the study analyzed the records from a group of women who were diagnosed with different types of arthritis, using varying types of pain medication, over a six-year period.  

Based on data in the patients medical records, patients who took narcotic-based pain medications were at a significantly higher risk for medical complications compared with their peers using other types of medications.  

While, researchers look closer at the underlying reasons for the increased rates of patient injury, I think this study should give patients reason to pause and re-consider the medications they are taking with their physicians to assure all medications are necessary and in the proper dosage.

Davocet & Darvon Pulled From Market After Study Correlates Use With Deadly Heart Problems

 

On November 19, 2010 the FDA ordered the popular painkillers Darvocet & Darvon to be pulled from the market.  

The decision to pull Darvocet & Darvon came after exhaustive studies and feedback from panels assembled by the FDA to evaluate the drugs safety. The results followed careful evaluation of advisory panel findings and data from scientific studies that concluded that the drugs should be pulled from the market because of the strong correlation to QT internal abnormalities in the heart.

Specifically, electrocardiography data demonstrated that even healthy patients developed abnormal heart rhythms after using Darvocet and Darvon (propoxyphene) as intended with the dosages recommended by the manufacturer.

Though these drugs were approved for treatment of pain more than 50 years ago, there has been widespread requests to have the drugs removed from the market as more painkillers have become available that have minimal side-effects.

The legal rights of for those who were injured or killed

Given the extensive history of use of Darvocet and Darvon, it is extremely likely that the manufacturer Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc. had knowledge of the dangers of the heart problems associated with these drugs-- yet never warned the public or took action to remove them from the market prior to this recent FDA action.

If you have a loved one who suffered an injury or death following the use of Darvocet or Darvon, you may have legal rights for damages against the drug manufacturer.  Currently, we are evaluating cases involving the following complications:

  • Irregular heart rhythms
  • Bradycardia
  • Stroke
  • Techycardia
  • Heart attack
  • Heart failure
  • Blockage in the heart
  • Death

Though Darvocet and Darvon lawsuits are in the early stages, you may wish to talk with a drug lawyer to discuss your potential legal rights. 

As always, we offer you the opportunity to speak to a lawyer for a free evaluation of your circumstance. (888) 424-5757

Related:

Xanodyne agrees to withdraw propoxyphene from the U.S. market, November 19, 2010 FDA

SCHROEDER LECTURE WORST PILLS, BEST PILLS (PDF) by Sidney Wolfe

Even After Warnings, Reglan Continues To Be Prescibed And Cause Devastating Problems For Many Patients-- Including Tardive Dyskinesia

 

In a previous post, I talked about Reglan (Metoclopramide), a drug commonly used to relieve heartburn in patients with GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease) or to relieve symptoms of slow stomach emptying for people with diabetes. Well, it turns out that this drug can also cause tardive dyskinesia (TD). Tardive dyskinesia is abnormal muscle movements, mostly in the face muscles, that you have no control over. TD has no treatment, and the symptoms might not go away even you stop taking raglan. 

Clearly, TD is not a minor side effect. The FDA took action requiring manufacturers of the drug to add a “black box” warning about the drug’s risks. The U.S. National Library of Medicine – National Institute of Health Website now includes an IMPORTANT WARNING in its information for metoclopramide (better known as Reglan) –

“Taking metoclopramide may cause you to develop a muscle problem called tardive dyskinesia. If you develop tardive dyskinesia, you will move your muscles, especially the muscles in your face in unusual ways. You will not be able to control or stop these movements. Tardive dyskinesia may not go away even after you stop taking metoclopramide. The longer you take metoclopramide, the greater the risk that you will develop tardive dyskinesia. Therefore, your doctor will probably tell you not to take metoclopramide for longer than 12 weeks. The risk that you will develop tardive dyskinesia is also greater if you are taking medications for mental illness, if you have diabetes, or if you are elderly, especially if you are a woman. Call your doctor immediately if you develop any uncontrollable body movements, especially lip smacking, mouth puckering, chewing, frowning, scowling, sticking out your tongue, blinking, eye movements, or shaking arms or legs.

Your doctor or pharmacist will give you the manufacturer's patient information sheet (Medication Guide) when you begin treatment with metoclopramide and each time you refill your prescription. Read the information carefully and ask your doctor or pharmacist if you have any questions. You can also visit the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website(http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm085729.htm) or the manufacturer's website to obtain the Medication Guide. Talk to your doctor about the risks of taking metoclopramide.”

The FDA’s medication guide also includes warnings about how Reglan can cause tardive dyskinesia. TD (as a result of Reglan) is most common in the elderly, especially elderly women.  

Reglan Drug Timeline

Prescribing Reglan

At the time of the FDA’s decision to require a black box warning, more than 2 million Americans were taking metoclopramide drugs. Reglan was commonly prescribed for patients suffering from acid reflux, GERD (gastroesophageal disorders), and nausea. According to the FDA, metoclopramide is only recommended for short-term treatment (≤ 3 months) of gastrointestinal disorders. 

However, many patients have taken Reglan for longer periods of time, increasing their risk of TD. In many cases, Reglan was a treatment option that offered positive results in treating gastroesophageal problems, but it came with a serious risk. Reglan now carries a warning against frequent and long-term use, but this warning came too late for many people who now suffer from lasting side effects such as tardive dyskinesia. Older people, especially older women, and people who have been taking Reglan for a long time are most at risk for tardive dyskinesia. 

Metoclopramide was even prescribed to women suffering from morning sickness. In a June 2009 article, MSNBC reported about a study in the New England Journal of Medicine that showed that metoclopramide could be prescribed to pregnant women suffering from morning sickness in the first trimester without causing harm to their babies. The drug was prescribed to pregnant women for short-term use and most women in the study only took the drug for 7 days. 

Morning sickness is most common in the first trimester, but it can last throughout pregnancy for some women. Because morning sickness can last longer than the 12-week maximum that the FDA recommends in order to reduce the risk of TD, it seems misleading and inappropriate that the reports would not at least mention the FDA black box warning. The risks associated with long-term use of a drug should be discussed, or at least mentioned, when discussing a new use of a drug, especially to inform potential users of all possible risks. 

Status of Reglan Litigation

Reglan has been prescribed to numerous patients since it was approved in 1985. And, according to the FDA, over 2 million Americans use metoclopramide. According to the drug makers, there have been over 20 years of Reglan litigation

On June 3, 2009, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation denied the plaintiffs request to consolidate the Reglan litigation during pretrial proceedings in a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL). This motion was filed by plaintiffs in 15 different Reglan lawsuits in 11 different district courts. The drug makers opposed the consolidation, citing that since the first Reglan case was filed in 1988, there have been more than 20 years of Reglan litigation, and 80% of those cases were resolved. 

The Panel determined that there was no single common defendant and most questions that remained were too complex or numerous to support consolidation, despite the cases involving the common factual issue about whether Reglan causes tardive dyskinesia. 

In one of the Reglan cases, a woman from Arkansas alleges that she developed TD after taking Reglan for over a year. Her case alleges that she did not have access to the FDA’s warnings. The lawsuit states that almost one-third of all patients taking Reglan took the drug for at least a year, increasing their risk for TD. These patients trusted their doctors to make informed and safe decisions about their medical treatment, and they also trusted the drug companies to test the drugs and provide information to patients so they could make informed decisions. Some of the lawsuits claim that the drug makers knew about the risk of tardive dyskinesia for decades. Unfortunately in the case of Reglan, the system seems to have let people down. 

If you believe that you or a loved one suffered an injury after taking Reglan, we would honor the opportunity to speak with you.  In certain situations, a lawsuit may be pursued against the drug manufacturer and the physician who was prescribing it at the time.  As will all of our cases, we prosecute drug-related claims on a contingency basis-- clients never pay any expenses out of their pocket.  (888) 424-5757.

Thank you to Heather Keil, J.D. for her assistance with this Nursing Homes Abuse Blog entry.

Sources:

Nursing Homes Abuse Blog: Use of Reglan Has Been Linked to Development of Tardive Dyskinesia or Abnormal Muscle Spasms

Medicine Net: Metoclopramide

FDA’s MedWatch Safety Alerts, March 2009: Reglan and Nervous System Disorder

About Lawsuits: Reglan Litigation Will Not Be Consolidated in MDL

eMedicine: Tardive Dyskinesia

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke: NINDS Tardive Dyskinesia Information Page

The Public Record: More Warnings Needed on Reglan Side Effects

Recognition of Movement Disorders: Extrapyramidal Side Effects and Tardive Dyskinesia

The New England Journal of Medicine: The Safety of Metoclopramide Use in the First Trimester of Pregnancy

The New York Times: Drug Appears Safe for Morning Sickness

 

New Government Reports Provide Further Evidence Of Avandia's Dangers

New reports to be issued following a Senate investigation and results from a clinical trial appear to further solidify the dangers associated with Avandia (rosiglitazone).  As cited by The New York Times, the reports conclude that if Avandia patients switched to a similar diabetes drug, Actos, approximately 500 heart attacks and 300 cases of heart failure could be avoided every month.

These recent studies are just the latest in an extensive series of studies that have been critical of both the side-effects associated with Avandia and GlaxoSmithKline's knowledge of the health risks when it aggressively marketed the drug.

The Senate investigation revealed:

  • A 2003 study, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline, diabetics who took Avandia had far more heart problems than those given placebos.
  • In 2003, the World Health Organization sent GlaxoSmithKline an alert of the problems associated with Avandia
  • In 2004, European regulators ordered Glaxo to conduct a study into Avandia's safety following the reports of problems associated with Avandia
  • In 2006 and 2007, broad-based studies of Avandia patients concluded that there were major safety concerns and the results were communicated to the FDA

As lawyers who frequently represent the elderly, we have many clients who have taken Avandia at some point in their lives-- and at this point they are rightfully concerned.  Avandia has been linked to two types of edema (swelling or accumulation of fluid). Peripheral edema is swelling of the extremities due to fluid buildup. Macular is the swelling and protein buildup in the eye area.

The edemas have been linked to congestive heart failure and heart attacks. Studies suggest that there is a 43% increase in having a heart attack in people who have taken Avandia than the general population.

In addition to heart problems, Avandia has been linked to the following adverse medical conditions:

  • Blurred vision
  • Decreased visual acuity
  • Liver problems
  • Weight gain
  • Jaundice
  • Hypoglycemia

If you have concerns regarding your legal rights related to Avandia usage, we would be honored to speak with you.  (888) 424-5757

Related:

Have You Suffered An Injury After Taking Avandia?

Research Ties Diabetes Drug to Heart Woes, New York Times, February 20, 2010

Zinc From Denture Creams Has Been Linked To Neurological Disease

In the wake yesterday's announcement from GlaxoSmithKline that they will stop the manufacture, distribution and advertising of their well-known denture adhesive product Super PoliGrip, we have been inundated with calls from concerned clients and their families who are concerned about the health risks and their legal rights.

At the heart of the matter is zinc, a metallic chemical element, that is commonly used in everyday products from sunscreens to vitamins.  With respect to denture adhesives, like Super Poligrip and Fixodent, some recent studies have demonstrated that the zinc found in denture adhesives may leach out into the body resulting in elevated zinc levels.

Elevated zinc levels in the body are believed to be responsible for neurological problems and neuropathy.  A blood test can confirm if the zinc levels have reached toxic levels.  Unfortunately, research has also demonstrated that the effects of zinc poisoning may be permanent and irreversible.

Common physical symptoms of zinc poisoning may include:

  • Numbness in hands, feet, arms or legs
  • Tingling in the hands, feet, arms or legs
  • Inability to move arms or legs
  • Pain in arms or legs
  • Frequent falls

PoliGrip and Proctor & Gamble's Fixodent compose a large portion of the denture adhesion cream market composed of more than 30 million denture users.  However, never in the long-term history or these products, has GlaxoSmithKline or Proctor & Gamble given any warning to the consumer that the use of their products could be dangerous.

What remains clear at this point, is that a generation has been betrayed by drug companies that they had put their trust in--- to provide a safe and fairly labeled product. 

If you believe you or your loved one sustained an injury or death related to zinc poisoning from a PoliGrip product (Super PoliGrip Original, Super PoliGrip Ultra Fresh or Super PoliGrip Extra Care) or Fixodent,  we would be honored to speak with you regarding your legal rights.  At this time, there may be several legal avenues to recover damages for injuries including: an individual lawsuit or joining a 'class action' involving the Denture Cream Products Liability Multidistrict Litigation.  

As with every case we have handled for more than 30 years, all legal consultations are free and confidential. (888) 424-5757

Resources:

Study Finds a Possible Link Between Denture Cream and Imbalance, ABC News, May 5, 2009

Study cites danger of zinc poisoning from denture creams, Times-Standard, July 12, 2009

Glaxo to remove zinc from denture cream, ABC News, February 18, 2010

GSK Consumer Healthcare warns consumers of potential health risks associated with long-term excessive use of zinc-containing denture adhesives

Two suits claim zinc in P&G’s Fixodent causes harm, BusinessCourier, March 20, 2009

Nursing Home Patients Continue To Receive Drugs Associated With Known Dangers

Through no fault of their own, many nursing home patients continue to receive medications known to potentially cause serious injury or death.  Many of these situations involve claims for damage against the drug manufacturers themselves.  In other cases, the prescribing physician may be partially responsible for failing to monitor the patient.

In 1988 the FDA approved the use of Gadolinium for use as a contrast agent in MRI's. Contrast agents help in enhancing the clarity of MRI images. Gadolinium bonds with damaged or diseased tissues giving doctors a much clearer picture of organs that they would without.

On June 8, 2006 the FDA issued a warning that Gadolinium may be linked to Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) or Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy (NFD). NSF & NFD patients may have one or more of the follow conditions:

Avandia is the most commonly prescribed diabetes drug in the United States. Avandia (rosiglitazone) is used to treat type 2, non-insulin dependent diabetes by increasing the bodies sensitivity to insulin. Avandia is manufactured by pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline and has been on the market since 1999. If you have type 2, diabetes there is a strong likelihood you may have taken Avandia at some time.

Ruth Lomeo, a 44-year-old disabled person, will receive $1.6 million from the California nursing home responsible for her care. In July, 2005 Lomeo was admitted to Edgemoor Geriatric Hospital for treatment of Lupus, a chronic inflammatory disease. The nursing home staff was responsible for properly administering Fentanyl skin patches to help Lomeo cope with chronic pain. Physician orders directed the nursing home staff to put the pain patches on alternating arms every 48 hours.

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (“SJS”) is a systemic disorder that affects the skin and mucous membranes, usually caused by a severe drug reaction. SJS often begins with flu-like symptoms (fever, sore throat, cough, burning eyes), then progresses to red or purple rashes and blisters (photos), especially around the mouth, nose, eyes. These symptoms eventually lead to skin sloughing (the shedding of the top layer of skin) because of cell death. Some patients with extreme cases of SJS appear as though they were severely burned due to the extensive skin loss.

We've all gone through the unpleasant task of preparing for a colonoscopy. Drinking an unpleasant liquid or popping pills for the purpose of giving the doctor a better view of our colon's contents is.... anything but pleasant. Now, news has surfaced that, depending on the product you used to prepare for the procedure, the experience may not have been merely unpleasant-- but downright dangerous.

On December 11, 2008, the FDA ordered the makers of Visicol and OsmoPrep to put a black box warning on their products alerting consumers to the fact that the drugs can cause kidney damage or death. The warning came after the FDA confirmed more than 20 reports of a severe kidney injury called acute phosphate nephropathy after people consumed the products. Acute phosphate nephropathy may progress resulting in: kidney failure, long-term dialysis, the need for a kidney transplant or death.

Recently, we were contacted by the family of a lady who within several months of taking Reglan Tablets, began to develop severe muscle spasms in her face. We soon found out that the staff physician had prescribed Reglan several months before the spasms started.

Reglan (generic name – metoclopramide) speeds up the movement of the stomach muscles, which increases the rate at which the stomach empties into the intestines. This prescription drug is used to treat gastrointestinal disorders including heartburn caused by gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD), diabetic gastroparesis (stomach does not contract), and to prevent nausea and vomiting caused by cancer chemotherapy and surgery.

For more than 30 years Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers has championed the legal rights of the injured.  If you suffered believe a drug is responsible for the death or injury to a loved one, we welcome you to contact us for a free legal consultation to learn your rights.  (888) 424-5757

Use Of Reglan Has Been Linked To Development Of Tardive Dyskinesia Or Abnormal Muscle Spasms

My office frequently gets contacted by concerned family members who may be unable to specify the exact type of error and facility made, but nonetheless they have a clear belief that their loved one's condition has changed for the worse due to improper care or taking an dangerous drug.  

Recently we were contacted by the family of a lady who within several months of taking Reglan Tablets, began to develop severe muscle spasms in her face.  We soon found out that the staff physician had prescribed Reglan several months before the spasms started.

Reglan (generic name – metoclopramide) speeds up the movement of the stomach muscles, which increases the rate at which the stomach empties into the intestines. This prescription drug is used to treat gastrointestinal disorders including heartburn caused by gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD), diabetic gastroparesis (stomach does not contract), and to prevent nausea and vomiting caused by cancer chemotherapy and surgery.

Reglan can cause serious side effects including:

  • Tardive Dyskinesia - abnormal muscle movements (see “Black Box Warning” below)
  • Uncontrolled spasms of your face and neck muscles, or muscles of your body, arms, and legs (dystonia)
  • Depression, thoughts about suicide, and suicide
  • Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome (NMS) –
  • Parkinsonism – condition similar to Parkinson’s, symptoms include slight shaking, body stiffness, trouble moving or keeping your balance

The FDA's Black Box Warning On Reglan

The FDA has recently required that manufacturers of metoclopramide add a “black box” warning about the risk of its long-term or high-dose use. The black box warning is the FDA’s strongest warning for drugs.

According to the FDA, more than 2 million Americans use drugs that contain metoclopramide (including Reglan tablets, Reglan oral disintegrating tablets, metoclopramide oral solution, and Reglan injection). Following this new warning, the FDA advises that chronic metoclopramide therapy should be avoided in all but rare cases where the benefits outweigh the risks.

Chronic use of metoclopramide has been linked to tardive dyskinesia, which may include involuntary, repetitive, and purposeless movements of the body (including grimacing, lip smacking, tongue protrusion, eye blinking, or rapid leg and arm movements). These symptoms are rarely reversible and there is no known treatment; although, in some patients, symptoms may lessen once metoclopramide treatment is stopped.

The risk of development of tardive dyskinesia is directly related to the length of time a patient is taking metoclopramide and the number of doses taken. Elderly patients are among the greatest at risk, especially older women and patients who have been on the drug for a long time. Therefore, extreme caution should be taken in prescribing Reglan to elderly nursing home residents. Your chances for getting tardive dyskinesia go up:

  • The longer you take Reglan and the more Reglan you take (you should not take raglan for more than 12 weeks)
  • If you are older, especially if you are a woman
  • If you have diabetes

Nursing homes should immediately evaluate all residents who are currently taking Reglan in order to determine whether continued Reglan treatment is necessary and beneficial in light of the FDA warning.

If you believe that your loved one, suffered an injury after taking Reglan, we would honor the opportunity to speak with you.  In certain situations, a lawsuit may be pursued against the drug manufacturer and the physician who was prescribing it at the time.  As will all of our cases, we prosecute drug-related claims on a contingency basis-- clients never pay any expenses out of their pocket.  (888) 424-5757

Resources:

FDA: FDA requires boxed warning and risk mitigation strategy for metoclopramide-containing drugs

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke: Tardive Dyskinesia

FDA: Reglan Medication Guide

Medications Such As: Visocol, OsmoPrep, or Fleet Phoso-Soda May Cause Kidney Failure Or Death In The Elderly

We've all gone through the unpleasant task of preparing for a colonoscopy.  Drinking an unpleasant liquid or popping pills for the purpose of giving the doctor a better view of our colon's contents is.... anything but pleasant.  Now, news has surfaced that, depending on the product you used to prepare for the procedure, the experience may not have been merely unpleasant-- but downright dangerous.

On December 11, 2008, the FDA ordered the makers of Visicol and OsmoPrep to put a black box warning on their products alerting consumers to the fact that the drugs can cause kidney damage or death. The warning came after the FDA confirmed more than 20 reports of a severe kidney injury called acute phosphate nephropathy after people consumed the products.  Acute phosphate nephropathy may progress resulting in: kidney failure, long-term dialysis, the need for a kidney transplant or death. 

On the heels of the FDA warnings regarding Visicol and OsmoPrep, C.B. Fleet Company, the manufacturer of Fleet Phoso-Soda and Fleet Phoso Soda EZ Prep Bowel Cleansing System, stopped selling the products over-the-counter without a prescription.

Visicol, OsmoPrep, and the Fleet Phoso-Soda products all contain high doses of sodium phosphate that works to clean out peoples bowels before medical procedures such as colonoscopies.  

According to Dr. Joyce Korvick, deputy director of the FDA's Division of Gastroenterology Products at the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, "Of the reported cases, three were biopsy-proven cases of acute phosphate nephropathy.  The onset of the kidney injury in these cases varied, occurring n some within several hours of the use of the products and in other cases up to 21 days after use."

The FDA's warnings applicable to Visicol, OsmoPrep and Fleet Phoso-Soda products are particularly relevant to elderly people, because studies have repeatedly shown medical complications in the following demographics after they take oral sodium phosphate tablets:

  • People over 55-years-old
  • People suffering from dehydration
  • People suffering from kidney disease
  • People taking medications to control blood pressure (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors- to lower blood pressure or angiotensin receptor blockers- used to treat high blood pressure)
  • People taking anti-inflammatory medications (including many arthritis medications or ibuprofen)

Symptoms of Acute Phosphate Nephropathy:

People with acute phosphate nephropathy may or may not have physical symptoms of their illness. In the case of those with no physical symptoms, blood tests that measure kidney function can be used to confirm the diagnosis.

The majority of people with acute phosphate nephropathy have some physical manifestation of the disease including one or more of the following symptoms:

  • Reduced urine output
  • Rapid energy loss
  • Swelling in the legs and ankles

If you have a loved one who suffered acute phosphate nephropathy, kidney failure, the need for a kidney transplant, the need for long-term dialysis or died after taking a Fleet product, Visicol or OsmoPrep, you may have legal rights for damages against the manufacturer of the product. Additionally, if your family member was administered the drug at medical facility such as a nursing home or hospital, a cause of action may also exist against that facility.

At Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers, we pride ourselves on a hands-on approach when evaluating every case.  We believe our rigorous case analysis with some of the leading medical professionals, helps secure the best results for our clients.  As we have done for more than 30 years, we will evaluate your potential case at no expense for you.  (888) 424-5757

Resource:

Oral Sodium Phosphate (OSP) Products for Bowel Cleansing (marketed as Visicol and OsmoPrep, and oral sodium phosphate products available without a prescription), FDA 12/11/2008

Medications Commonly Prescribed To Nursing Home Patients May Cause Stevens Johnson Syndrome

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (“SJS”) is a systemic disorder that affects the skin and mucous membranes, usually caused by a severe drug reaction.  SJS often begins with flu-like symptoms (fever, sore throat, cough, burning eyes), then progresses to red or purple rashes and blisters (photos), especially around the mouth, nose, eyes.  These symptoms eventually lead to skin sloughing (the shedding of the top layer of skin) because of cell death.  Some patients with extreme cases of SJS appear as though they were severely burned due to the extensive skin loss.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome is a hypersensitivity disorder usually caused by a reaction to a newly prescribed medication.  Although any drug can cause SJS, several drugs are often associated with SJS including: anti-gout medications, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, sulfonamides and penicillins, and anticonvulsants.

Some drugs which have been associated with SJS that are frequently prescribed to nursing home patients include:

  • Advil
  • Motrin
  • Vioxx
  • Celebrex
  • Bextra

 

Although Stevens-Johnson Syndrome is difficult to predict, there are several risk factors.  These include existing medical conditions (pre-existing infections) and genetics (carrying the HLA-B12 gene).  Still, there are no tests to help determine who is at risk for SJS.  To diagnose SJS, doctors conduct a physical exam and possibly a biopsy of the skin for further examination. 

Elderly patients in nursing homes are particularly susceptible to Stevens-Johnson syndrome because nursing home facilities fail to properly screen residents prior to administering potentially reactive drugs.  This is especially when a medication is prescribed by a physician who does not have ongoing contact with the patient.  Also, many nursing homes do not adequately train their staff to look for adverse reactions to drugs.

Treatment of Stevens-Johnson syndrome often requires hospitalization, especially because of possible complications.  These complications include a secondary skin infection, sepsis (bacteria entering the bloodstream, which can cause shock and even organ failure), eye problems (resulting from inflammation caused by any rash and blisters around the eyes), damaging lesions on internal organs, and permanent skin damage including abnormal coloring and scars.  The rash and blisters can take several weeks to heal, depending on the severity of the attack.  In more severe cases, where lesions cover about a third of the body, it is referred to as Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN). If SJS is left untreated, it can result in death.

The main treatment of SJS includes stopping the use of any medications that could be causing the Stevens-Johnson syndrome.  Further treatment includes fluid replacement and application of cool, wet compresses, accompanied by medication to ease itching and discomfort.  These supportive treatments are often performed in burn units. 

It is difficult to prevent Stevens-Johnson syndrome the first time because of how difficult it is to predict what will cause it; however, once a trigger is identified, that medication should be avoided in order to prevent further reactions.  Because recurrences of SJS are often more severe, it is important to properly identify SJS triggers. 

In the case of nursing home patients, we frequently see that staff physicians fail to alert staff to the fact that a new (and potentially dangerous drug) was introduced to patients.  This failure to communicate can lead nurses and other staff misinterpreting an allergic reaction to the medication as an general illness.  In some cases, the delay in diagnosis has resulted in irreversible injury or death.

Resources:

MayoClinic.com - Stevens-Johnson Syndrome

The Stevens-Johnson Syndrome Foundation

Photo Of Individual With Stevens Johnson Syndrome

Fentanyl Overdose Leads To 1.6M Nursing Home Settlement

Ruth Lomeo, a 44-year-old disabled person, will receive $1.6 million from the California nursing home responsible for her care.  In July, 2005 Lomeo was admitted to Edgemoor Geriatric Hospital for treatment of Lupus, a chronic inflammatory disease.  The nursing home staff was responsible for properly administering Fentanyl skin patches to help Lomeo cope with chronic pain.  Physician orders directed the nursing home staff to put the pain patches on alternating arms every 48 hours. 

On July 25, 2005, the nursing home staff negligently put two Fentanyl patches on one arm while leaving a third patch in place on the alternate arm.  As a result of the Fentanyl overdose, Lomeo began to experience difficulty breathing.  Despite the medical emergency, the nursing home staff waited more than 20 minutes to call 911.  The overdose compounded with the lack of medical attention lead to brain damage from lack of oxygen.  Read more about this case of a Fentanyl overdose at a California nursing home here.

Fentanyl is an incredibly powerful pain medication.  Medical professionals must strictly follow physician orders and carefully monitor patients to assure safe use of the drug.  Moreover, there have been reports of problems with the membrane on the back of some Fentanyl patches.  If your loved one has sustained an injury or death following administration of Fentanyl, it may be related to improper administration of Fentanyl or with the drug itself.  The experienced Fentanyl lawyers at Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers know how to evaluate Fentanyl cases.  Speak to an experienced drug litigation lawyer anytime.  (888) 424-5757

Have You Suffered An Injury After Taking Avandia?

 What is Avandia?

Avandia is the most commonly prescribed diabetes drug in the United States.  Avandia (rosiglitazone) is used to treat type 2, non-insulin dependent diabetes by increasing the bodies sensitivity to insulin. Avandia is manufactured by pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline and has been on the market since 1999.  If you have type 2, diabetes there is a strong likelihood you may have taken Avandia at some time.

What Type Of Adverse Side Effects Have Been Associated With Avandia?

Avandia has been linked to two types of edema (swelling or accumulation of fluid). Peripheral edema is swelling of the extremities due to fluid buildup.  Macular is the swelling and protein buildup in the eye area.  People who have taken Avandia have reported one or both types of edemas.  The edemas have been linked to congestive heart failure.  Studies suggest that there is a 43% increase in having a heart attack in people who have taken Avandia than the general population.

In addition to heart problems, Avandia has been linked to the following adverse medical conditions:

  • Blurred vision
  • Decreased visual acuity
  • Liver problems
  • Weight gain
  • Jaundice
  • Hypoglycemia

What Are My Rights If I Have Taken Avandia And Suffered Side Effects?

Given the fact that GlaxoSmithKline was aware of many of Avandia's side effects and did not act to immediately recall Avandia from the market, there appears to be significant culpability on the part of the manufacturer.  Depending on when you were prescribed, Avandia, you may also have a potential cause of action against the individual doctor or clinic.  

If you you a loved one has suffered from an injury since taking Avandia, you may contact our office for a free consultation and to learn your rights.  All consultations are kept confidential and there is no obligation on your part.  Please use the contact form or call, toll-free (888) 424-5757 to speak with our Avandia lawyers day or night.

Here is the May 21, 2007 FDA Safety Alert on Avandia.

MRI Danger: Gadolinium Liquid May Cause Severe Reactions Such As Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis

In 1988 the FDA approved the use of Gadolinium for use as a contrast agent in MRI's.  Contrast agents help in enhancing the clarity of MRI images.  Gadolinium bonds with damaged or diseased tissues giving doctors a much clearer picture of organs that they would without. 

On June 8, 2006 the FDA issued a warning that Gadolinium may be linked to Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) or Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy (NFD).   NSF & NFD patients may have one or more of the follow conditions:

  • Redded skin patches or rashes
  • Calcification (tightening) of muscle, skin and tendons
  • Muscle weakness
  • Thickening of skin epically around joints
  • Pain in the hips and ribs
  • Yellowness in eyes
  • Burning, itching pain in affected areas

The above conditions generally develop within 2 - 12 weeks follows exposure to Gadolinium.  Gadolinium is used in the following contract agents: Omniscan, Magnevist, MultiHance, OptiMARK and ProHance.  On May 23, 2007 the FDA issued issued an additional warning on the use of Gadolinium.

At this time it is unclear if drug manufacturers were aware of potential complications with Gadolinium.  If you have been diagnosed with NSF, NFD or have experienced any of the above conditions contact my office today to discuss your legal rights.

Here is an FDA warning regarding Gadolinium.

Heparin May Put Nursing Home Residents At Risk

Heparin is a commonly used blood thinner that has come under scrutiny for possible contamination.  The FDA has recommended restricting the use of high doses of Heparin, or generally known as Bolus dosing in an attempt to limit the severity of adverse reactions to the drug. Bolus dosing is used to quickly thin blood in some patients. 

The following people should be particularly aware of the Heparin contamination: hemodialysis patients, cardiovascular patients who have had surgery, photopheresis patients, plasapheresis patients and people who have had blood clots in their arteries.

There have been more than 350 complaints of adverse reactions to Heparin.  The adverse  reactions have been reported with the Heparin Sodium Injection multiple dose vials, 10 ml and 30 ml vials, 5000 units/ml, 10 ml vials and 10,000 units/ml, 4 ml vials.  The following reactions have been reported shortly following the administration of Heparin:

  • Severe allergic reactions
  • Death
  • Severe nausea
  • Vomiting
  • Disphoresis
  • Difficulty breathing
  • Low blood pressure

If you were administered Heparin and experienced any of the above conditions, contact an attorney to learn your rights both individually and as part of a class action lawsuit today.

See the FDA recall of Heparin here.

About Jonathan Rosenfeld

Photo of Jonathan Rosenfeld

Jonathan Rosenfeld is a lawyer who represents people injured in nursing homes and long-term care facilities.   Jonathan has represented...

Read More

Subscribe

Add this blog to your feeds or subscribe by email using the form below

Concerned about a loved one? Talk with an attorney today.

Bed Sore FAQs

Frequently asked questions on bed sore prevention, treatment and legal rights of those who have been neglected.

View FAQs